Entertaining, but immeasurably flawed
This review will contain spoilers!! The sole reason this story gains an additional half star is the fact that it was highly engrossing enough to be read in less than a week. However, for an author who prides herself on delivering positive queer and transgender representation, this is the worst queer book I’ve read. Let me begin by addressing the characters. The main character, Kate, is referred to by her deadname and he/him pronouns throughout the duration of the book, even after she’s established to have discovered her new name and identity. The other character Leo, an out trans male, is so incredibly unlikeable in a way that’s supposed to be written off as him being a “bad boy” (at least to my knowledge and understanding of the work). In a scene where Kate reveals her new name to Leo as the two enjoy an evening together drunk, Leo is finally enthusiastic, but quickly refers to Kate by her deadname once again upon waking up sober and hungover the following day. Aside from Kate, most of the characters are unlikeable, particularly Leo’s ex girlfriend Alycia. Upon discovering that Leo is trans, she proceeds to refer to herself as someone who has been betrayed in the relationship, determined to victimize herself in a tense situation that is entirely her fault to begin with. Moving on to the plot. The book I purchased has a synopsis that is incredibly misleading. It was described to be the story of Leo and Kate’s budding friendship as Leo supports Kate through her transitional journey. However, most of the story follows Leo embarking on an adventure in search of his biological father. He seems far from interested in having Kate join him, and only allows her to join due to her insistence. They certainly grow closer throughout the journey, though it still feels incredibly shallow. In regards to Alycia’s side of the story, she’s primarily absent, but returns in the final scene of the last chapter to apologize to Leo and re-introduce herself as a way of re-kindling their friendship on better terms. This, rather than being satisfying, is such an unfortunate ending, for it takes away from Leo and Kate’s friendship to redeem a character that shows no evidence of regretting her abuse towards Leo earlier in the story. I have already spoken briefly of the way queer characters and topics are handled in this book, and something else I would like to touch on is how non-main characters respond to Leo and Kate’s identities. Upon Leo being outed after his many attempts at lying low in his new school, practically every student and parent turns out to be transphobic. They throw Leo’s deadname around, which the author chooses to write out. I have read works revolving around other characters that include the utterance of a deadname (however, these other works never show the deadname itself, but rather the character’s reaction to having their identity be disrespected). However, never before have I read a work that chooses to throw around the deadname as a poor attempt at emotional impact. Leo’s reason for moving schools is revealed towards the end of the book, where readers learn that Leo suffered a horrible act of transphobia. I am absolutely open to content that delves into transphobia in graphic ways (it’s a real thing that should be addressed), however, for a cisgender author writing a book that already has poor queer representation, this flashback from Leo is so overdramatized. Much like him being deadnamed, it feels overdramatized for the sake of depicting the worst possible thing that could happen to someone like Leo. This, rather than granting me the emotional impact it’s supposed to, only makes me side-eye the book and author more. Overall, although entertaining, I didn’t find the characters to be likable, and the poor queer representation took me out of the story.










